Skip to content

Libya Darling

[reprinted from Political Relief. Thanks Chris!]

Libya Darling and Keep the Oil Flowing

For a country that did something truly revolutionary 235 years ago and is rightfully proud of it, our reactions to the recent protests in the Arab world would leave all but the most cynical person scratching their heads.

Libya is the latest dictatorship whose people are rising in protest, and embattled dictator Moammar Ghadaffi has shut down the information pipes in an effort to avoid becoming the latest regime to topple.

Of course, America can take credit for the protests in this African country which borders Chad, Niger, and so on, for it wasn’t until a plucky U.S. president dared to send his own people to fight the people of Iraq that freedom ever crossed the minds of young Libyans. Granted that was 2,000 miles away and eight years ago. But since the G.O.P. changed its mind and decided that that war was about democracy rather than defense, it’s entitled to take credit for any uprising that emerges in any sandy country from that point forward. (And the Saudi uprising of 2022? Students in Riyadh will march under banners lovingly depicting the Crusader from Crawford.)

Unfortunately, the U.S. media no longer melt in the presence of Rumsfeld; their new crush is Facebook and Twitter. How conceited it was to think it was American force in Iraq that enabled democracy in Tunisia and Egypt — it was actually American entrepreneurs! We’ve been told for years now that i-Phones and You Tubes are nothing short of revolutionary, so who can blame us if we think that Twitbook and Facetube are as important as the courage to face down soldiers with machine guns? The impact of these technologies has been anecdotal and the protests thrived even after web and cell connections were cut, but inspiring stories of oppressed people putting their lives on the line for freedom is somehow less compelling unless we are somehow involved.

The protests have succeeded in Egypt and Tunisia, but history’s still underway in Libya. Ghadaffi seems as willing to slaughter his own people as a homeowner is to phone an exterminator, so thousands of lives are truly on the line. Given our Republican party’s eagerness to rid Iraq of its oppressive regime, you’d think they’d be demanding that President Obama initiate Operation Free Libya, or at least that he petition the U.N. to impose a no-fly zone so Ghadaffi can’t strafe his own people from the air. But distant crickets on a summer night are louder. (The Democrats aren’t much better, though Sen. John Kerry has made a start.)

And you’d think for all our American pride about freedom and for our leaders’ flowery speeches citing foreign peoples looking to the U.S.A. for inspiration and encouragement against tyrannical regimes, that we’d demand our leaders do everything possible to support the Libyan revolution, perhaps seeing the same glimmers of independence that we think of so fondly when we quote our own founding fathers and revolutionaries.

But after the latest estimated death toll (likely over 1,000) or wacky pronouncement from Ghadaffi (al-Qaeda is “putting drugs in protesters’ milk and coffee“), the analysis soon turns to what really concerns us (or rather, our own regime): the price of oil (Libyan output down 75%).



  1. Bard wrote:

    This shouldn’t be surprising, in the early days of the United States we loaned France something along the line of 400K Dollars to help put down the Uprising in Haiti. It was a huge sum of money for the young country.

    Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 3:44 pm | Permalink
  2. PatriotSGT wrote:

    Following the Vietnam war we watched as 2 million Cambodians were slaughtred. We watched as 100’s of thousands of Rowandans were slaughtered. We did stop the bloodshed in Bosnia and Kosovo, but I’m guessing thats because of our european roots. We stood by after the 1st gulf war as Saddam slaughtered 100,000 plus shites who revolted in the south of Iraq (but we did maintain a no fly zone that did absolutely nothing). We watched and cheered on the protesters in Iran only to see their dictatorship crush the rebellion.

    Problem is we don’t have the stomach, nor the treasure to be the police force of the world. No one would support any type of military intervention given the last 8 years and the white house had a scheduling conflict and thats why they couldn’t come up with a plan.

    Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 4:41 pm | Permalink
  3. BTN wrote:

    Well, it is tricky on deciding when to officially support overthrowing a government… Besides, in that part of the world, getting an endorsement from the US could do just as much harm as good.

    What’s interesting is that while Iran blamed the US for their uprising, Gaddafi blames *Osama bin Laden*,0,3259447.story

    Nice pie chart, BTW

    Thursday, February 24, 2011 at 9:18 pm | Permalink
  4. PatriotSGT wrote:

    I guess he figured the US would come rushing to his aid if he mentioned OBL. Psych – not.

    Friday, February 25, 2011 at 3:34 pm | Permalink